d) Lower
Risk (LR): when it has been evaluated, does not satisfy the criteria
of threat under
the above mentioned
categories.
i) Conservation
Dependent (cd): when a taxon is the focus of a conservation programme,
the cessation of the programme would place the taxon in the threatened
categories.
ii) Near
Threatened (nt): when a taxon does not qualify for conservation
dependent, but which
are close to qualifying for Vulnerable.
iii) Least
Concern (lc): when a taxon does not qualify for Conservation
Dependent, nor near
Threatened.
B. Data Deficient (DD):
when data are deficient to make an assessment of the risk of extinction
a taxon faces.
II. Not
Evaluated (NE): when a taxon has not yet been assessed against the
criteria. In the new
approach, the old categories like Rare (R), Indeterminate (I) and
Insufficiently known (K) have been dropped and the categories Threatened,
Endangered and Vulnerable have been redefined. The following points are to
be remembered:
a) the new categories are to be
determined based on the detailed criteria provided by the IUCN (Anonymous,
1994),
b)
criteria are applicable to any taxon at or below the level of the species
alone,
c) a
taxon need not meet all the criteria for being put in one of the
categories,
d) Not Evaluated or Data
Deficient qualification does not mean that the taxon is not under threat,
e) the
criteria are quantitative,
f)
conservation action is needed for some taxa even when not listed as
threatened,
g) the
category of threat is not necessarily sufficient to determine priorities
for conservation,
h) the
criteria are most appropriately applied at the global level,
i) when the criteria and
categories are used in a national or a regional context, the global
situation also should be given, till the IUCN
develope guidelines for national and regional Red
List categories,
j) the
categorisation of taxa is not final and it needs to be reassessed
periodically, and
k) taxa can be transferred from
one category to another, if the reviewed situation warrants such a
change.
Application of the new criteria of the IUCN will certainly show up that a
very large number of the Indian plant species fall under one or the other
category, but we do not have any solid quantitative data to support any
such move right now. Hubbardia heptaneuron Bor (Poaceae) was
collected for the first and the only time, and described, from the
water-sprayed rocks under the Gerasoppa water falls in Karnataka in the
early 1930s. A hydroelectric project involving the river has changed the
habitat drastically and irreversibly and all subsequent efforts to collect
this species, have failed. This species was represented only by a
couple of herbarium specimens deposited by the original author in the
Herbarium of the Royal Botanic Garden at Kew, England. Till recently, Hubbardia
heptaneuron was considered as extinct (EX), but has been
rediscovered a year ago in Maharashtra. Paphiopedilum druryi, an
endemic Indian species, was first reported in 1865 and was not collected
again till 1974, and once more in 1992 from the wild. This species falls
under the category of Critically Endangered (ER). Most of the Indian taxa
fall into either Data Deficient (DD) or Not Evaluated (NE), which does not
mean that they are not at risk, but a very sad and inadequate situation
from the scientific point of view.
The
1994 version of the structure of categories of threat to plants has been
reviewed recently by the SSC Criteria Review Working Group (Anonymous,
1999), but it would take some time before the revised version is released
for use.
CITES
APPENDICES
CITES
periodically reviews the situation of trade in threatened plants and
animals and publishes lists of trade restricted species in three
Appendices, the degree of restriction being most severe for those in the
Appendix I. Some Indian examples are given below:
Appendix
I: Soussurea lappa
Cycas beddomei
Appendix
II:
Cyathea species (tree ferns)
Orchidaceae—many species
Podophyllum hexandrum
Rauvolfia serpentina
Dioscorea deltoidea
Nardostachys grandiflora
Picrorrhiza kurrooa
Taxus wallichiana