ANTIBACTERIAL
ACTIVITY OF PLANT EXTRACTS
The
effects of plant extracts on bacteria have been studied by a very large
number of workers, in different parts of the world. The diverse species of
plants used for this type of study, the different types of bacterial
models and the large number of workers from different labs, have all
contributed models
and the large number of workers from different labs, have all contributed
to a lack of cogency and order. Comparability between studies is minimal.
It
is necessary that plants with possible antimicrobial activity should be
tested against an appropriate microbial model to confirm the activity and
to understand the parameters associated with that activity. In order to
evaluate the efficacy of species indicated against a particular disorder,
it is apt to test only those pathogens responsible for that disorder. For
example, if we are at finding species of plants with antimicrobial
activity in gastro-intestinal disorders, tests should be conducted against
gastro-intestinal pathogens. Such correlated studies are not common.
Dr
Assumpta Sharon has isolated gastro-intestinal pathogens from patients in
St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, and studied the effects
of species used in gastro-intestinal disorders against them, in order to
verify the validity of the claims in traditional literature. As these
extensive data (Sharon, 1994) cannot be presented here, a summary of the
results is given in Table 1. Quite a number of them proved to be either
bacteriostatic or bactericidal. Most of the plant extracts used contained
lectins. In separate tests she found that some extracts agglutinate the
pathogenic bacteria, which certainly affects their growth. More
importantly, some extracts did not agglutinate bacteria, but have
inhibited their growth (Sharon, 1994). Consequently, cell agglutination
and inhibition of growth are independent phenomena.
The
most interesting among the extracts tested was that of the fruit rind of
pomegranate (Punica granatum), which is a waste product. This
nontoxic extract was very effective against a broad range of intestinal
pathogens, more particularly the cholera bacterium. Also used in
traditional medicine, pomegranate holds a good promise of becoming one of
the most potent medicines against gastro-intestinal infections (Sharon,
1994).
It
is necessary to assess the bacteriostatic efects of plants extracts
against standard antibiotics, in order to obtain a scientific and
comparative basis to excercise choices. The results of such a study on
gastro-intestinal pahogens are given in Appendix 37. Obviously, several of
the species of plants here are very potent antibacterials. Their use in
traditional medicine is quite justified. The effects of pomegranate fruit
rind extracts also compare very favourably with standard antibiotics.
Dr
Shubharani has conducted a similar study employing extracts of several
species of plants used in dental care against oral pathogens and found
that some of them function as as bacteriostatic and/or bactericidal agents
(Shubharani, 1995). On a comparison of the results obtained by Fadula
(1975), on west African species, the data discussed by Oliver-Bever
(1986), and the results of Sharon (1994) and Shubharani (1995), the
following species, all of which are in use in traditional medicine, appear
to be effective in the control of oral bacteria, and can be used as tooth
brushes, chewing sticks, tooth powders, and in medication:
Anacardium
occidentale, Artocarpus heterophyllus, Azadirachta indica, Cocos nucifera,
Emblica officinalis, Jatropha gossypifolia, Mnagifera indica, Moringa
oleifera, Psidium guajava, and
Punica granatum,