In contrast, in
countries like India, almost any thing is available, at a price.
Certainly there are restrictions on the sale of certain so-called
scheduled drugs, but the regulations are ignored more often than not. In
recent times, a strict vigilance, on the sale of tranquillisers like
diazapam has reduced their availability without a prescription.
Otherwise, it is free trade, even of drugs banned elsewhere. The need
for a rational policy regulating drug supply and use in India has been
reiterated recently (Phadke, 1998).
Ayurvedic
and homoeopathic medicines do not require a prescription at all. Nothing
prevents one from buying these drugs, though many of them are quite
dangerous, if used without medical supervision.
In
the west there are restrictions on advertising drugs except in
professional journals. In India, a very large number of medications,
more in the name of herbal products, are freely advertised in the press
and on the TV. This practice should be discontinued.
Popularisation
of medicine through advertisement and an easy availability of drugs
without a prescription, promote free-lance prescription and
self-medication.
Administration
of a medicine and treatment of an ailment is a serious matter. Some
medicines are not safe for use, even under medical supervision. The
following are some of the reasons, which the general public are largely
unaware of, for discouraging free-lance prescription and
self-medication:
a) The seemingly
harmless aspirin considered a safe analgesic till recently, is now known
to cause a severe and dangerous gastric bleeding and other complications
in some people. Penicillin, a very useful antibiotic, safe for many
people, can cause severe and some times fatal reactions in some. Some
people develop serious reactions against certain drugs at later stages
of their life, though the drug was well tolerated earlier. An absence of
a reaction on the first few doses is no guarantee against the onset of
an adverse reaction, on a subsequent dose. Medical supervision is needed
with any drug at any stage of its administration.
b) The body gets
acclimatised to a drug on consistent use over a period of time. People
who take analgesics regularly, find that they need to increase the
dosage and/or frequency of intake of their favourite anlgesic, for
example aspirin. After a time the body does not respond to aspirin and a
switch to analgin or ibuprofen or something else, will be needed. Then
on the story repeats.
c) Some medicines are
addicting. Tranquilisers, cough syrups, etc., among the allopathic
medicines, and alcohol containing Ayurvedic medicines are some examples.
The number of people caught on to Draksharishta in the olden days was a
legion. In the wake of prohibition, in the early 1950s in Andhra Pradesh,
Draksharishta was in great demand as a worthwhile substitute and this
misuse made it necessary to impose certain restrictions on its
manufacture and sale. The risk of addiction to coffee and chocolates is
hardly known. But for the problems of addiction, opium, cannabis and
cocaine would have served the cause of medicine more profoundly. Against
the background of the current serious reluctance in permitting such
drugs as medication, the recent discovery that cannabinoids control
spasticity and tremour in multiple sclerosis models (Baker et al.,
Nature, March 2, 2000) is a sad case.
d) In the case of
infectious diseases, only the appropriate medicine, at an appropriate
dosage, should be used against a particular pathogen, as there is an
antibiotic-pathogen specificity, though some antibiotics have a broader
range of action. Antibacterial antibiotics are ineffective against viral
infections. If antibiotics are taken in such a case, the disease cannot
be controlled and the antibiotic will affect the bacterial populations
in the gastro-intestinal tract and disturb the natural balance of the
body’s micro-flora. If subsequently, for any reason the same
antibiotic is needed to be used, it may not be effective, as the
micro-organisms which were already exposed to that antibiotic might have
acquired resistance to it.
e) One should take the
full course of the medicine prescribed, more particularly so if the
medicine is an anti-microbial agent. Dosage of a medicine is carefully
calculated, to keep in the body, a particular concentration of the drug
for a specified period. If the medicine is stopped at a point when
patient on his own feels cured, there is a chance of only a partial
cure, or a segment of the microbial population becoming resistant
(acquired resistance) to the medicine, resulting in a new strain which
proliferates. Both these situations may lead to a relapse of the
disease. In relapse, the same medicine may be of no use. There have been
instances where patients have misused, through improper or
self-medication, the only antibiotic that could have otherwise saved
them.
f) One does not know
which medicine can cause what kind of side effects and to what degree
and under what conditions.
g) Popping in so many a
day of those multivitamin and other concoctions is largely useless,
dangerous and wasteful. The body can absorb and utilise only very small
quantities of exogenous vitamins, iron, etc. Most of what is taken is
excreted. Identifying and using dietary items rich in a specific
nutritional additive is far more useful and inexpensive.
h) Many substances that
get into the body are metabolised either through the liver or the
kidneys or in a few cases, both. What cannot be metabolised and absorbed
is excreted through these two organs. Drug misuse and abuse affects the
liver and the kidneys most. By all means one should avoid overtaxing
these two important organs
.